![]() It means saying you fucked up and not blaming others for your failures. Remember a few years ago when people were asking "Why can't people just say they made a mistake and own up to it instead of shifting blame?" Now that people are taking responsibility for mistakes publicly the response is "Yes, but what does that mean?" > As always with these things, I wonder what taking responsibility actually means in practice. Sure Zuck has lots a bunch of paper value but whether you have $100 billion or $30 billion, you're fine. So 11,000 people got let go today because of bad decisions made at the very top that they had nothing to do with and no control over. If we can ever build AR glasses (and that's far from a certainty) then maybe that might work but there are significant technical problems (eg matching focus, true blacks). It explains the purchase of Oculus and fits with the metaverse.īut there's literally no business case for the metaverse. Medium is essentiaally this progression: text -> image -> video -> VR -> AR. Twitter, for example, goes to a large audience. The behaviour does.īut here's the big one: Facebook has long viewed products on two axes: audience and medium. It's your weird uncle posting articles about chips in vaccines. But labelling misinformation treats this as a content problem when it's a user behaviour problem. That's never going to work and never going to make anyone happy. This first took form in response to the spread of misinformation in the aftermath of the 2016 election, Facebook decided to try and determine objective truth in posts. ![]() ![]() Assuming pandemic growth would continue (as he claims) isn't the problem. (This is the big one) Zuck has no vision for the company. You can support that on privacy grounds but that shouldn't obscure the issue that a platform being able to do that while maintaining that benefit themselves is actually a huge problem (and it makes a big case for Apple acting anticompetitively) Ģ. Apple's "do not track" feature really cut the ad business off at its knees. Hypothetically you could get recognized in H2 2020 but in reality it didn't really work like that most of the time.īut look, the big problem with Facebook is twofold:ġ. The "Don't worry about perf" also meant you couldn't get promoted that half and there was no recognition for better performance, which sort of sucked for people whose projects had come to fruition (where they reap the rewards of impact). Zuck's response to Covid definitely had upsides, particularly (as you mention) the continued payment of contractors even though offices were closed. Ex-Facebooker here too, also during that time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |